US Gynecologists Announce A Word Of Caution About Vaginal Rejuvenation
A lot of women are opting to have their private parts fixed or enhanced. The most usual clients for such type of cosmetic surgery procedure are those that have endured a number of pregnancies and births. However, the fad for fashionable vaginas is currently going up against tons of criticism from the medical field.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) stands firm in opposition of cosmetic surgery procedures such as vaginal rejuvenation, revirgination, and designer vaginoplasty. According to the group, such procedures are not medically essential and are not warranted to be safe.
Vaginal rejuvenation and similar procedures include altering the size and shape of the labia, refurbishing the hymen, and making the vagina tighter. In spite of the potentially appealing outcome of such procedures, various complications are also likely to arise later on. Altered sensation, scarring, pain, and infection are some of the undesirable complications that women should watch out for when going under the knife for vaginal rejuvenation.
According to Dr. Abbey Berenson, a lot of women do not completely realize that the external genitals may considerably vary in appearance from woman to woman. She further added that misleading marketing strategies have the ability to easily deceive some women. Most of them are deluded into thinking that they, in point of fact, require the surgery.
Doctors in the field of cosmetic surgery, however, say that the viewpoint of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is exaggeratedly precautious. The procedures, they say, are actually safe. As a matter of fact, an increasing number of women are opting for such surgeries. The media had even picked up and featured the craze in a number of occasions.
Dr. John Miklos, the Director of Atlanta Urogynecology Associates, Laser Vaginal Rejuventation Institute of Atlanta Medical Research Institute, is actually one of the surgeons who offer such procedures. According to Dr. Miklos, some of his previous patients had wanted to go under the knife for the simple reason that they wanted to make their vaginas tighter and consequently achieve a better sexual interaction. On the other hand, a number of people had actually requested the procedure to treat legitimate medical conditions like vaginal prolapse.
The genital cosmetic surgery procedures are also aimed at augmenting the G-spot and reconstructing the broken hymen. In G-spot augmentation, a filling agent is customarily introduced into the front, inner portion of the vagina.
The former President of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, Thomas Stovall, stated that the idea of undergoing the procedure for cosmetic purposes with the hopes of enhancing sexual satisfaction is absolutely ridiculous. Stovall is also affiliated with the University of Tennessee in Memphis as a clinical professor.
Despite of the group’s strong opinion on vaginal rejuvenation surgeries, the ACOG does not gather nor keep track of statistics on the number of procedures performed all over the country. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) holds the task of pulling together important data on vaginal rejuvenation. The group started out with the data gathering in 2005 and reported a total of 793 vaginal rejuvenation surgeries performed within the same year. In 2006, the total number of women who had opted for the procedure had leaped to 1,030.
A gynecologist from New Jersey, Marco Pelosi II, stated that such a surgery actually cost more than $50,000. The advanced laser equipment used in the procedures may cost from $3,500 to as high as $20,000 for a package of procedures. Pelosi also attended the training course given by Dr. Matlock.
Dr. Matlock, however, refused to be interviewed. In a statement, Matlock said that a lot of surgeons have enlisted themselves for his training course. Due to the developed skills and a good amount of proficiency over the past 12 years, his methods have eventually become the gold standard of care in vaginal rejuvenation procedures.
According to Dr. Matlock, he had treated more or less 3,000 women and instructed around 140 doctors. In the year 1988, the Medical Board of California attempted to revoke his license because of an alleged insurance scam, dishonesty, and negligence. Dr. Matlock finally settled the case with the board in 2000. Later on, he received four years of probation for the so-called insurance fraud.
Related posts
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply